How to Use HARO to Get High-Authority Backlinks and Press Mentions
Remember when getting press coverage meant knowing someone who knew someone? HARO turned that old-boys' club into a digital free-for-all where anyone with expertise and decent timing can snag quality backlinks and media mentions. Here's how to work the system.
HARO Hustle: The Slightly Desperate But Surprisingly Effective Path to Press Attention
Let's start with a confession: building backlinks is the SEO equivalent of trying to get into an exclusive club where the bouncer hates you. You're standing there, website in hand, begging publications to acknowledge your existence while they pretend not to see you. I've been there, waving my metaphorical arms frantically at journalists who had absolutely no reason to care about my fledgling business. Then I discovered HARO (Help A Reporter Out), which is essentially a matchmaking service for the attention-starved business owner and the deadline-panicked journalist. It's beautifully transactional – and it actually works.
What Is HARO and Why Should You Care?
HARO is a free service connecting journalists who need sources with people who desperately want to be those sources. Three times a day, HARO sends out emails packed with journalist queries spanning dozens of categories. The premise is simple: journalists need expert quotes for their articles, and you (yes, you) can pretend to be that expert.
The truth is, HARO is one of those rare win-win scenarios in the otherwise zero-sum game of digital marketing. Journalists get their quotes without having to leave their desk, and you get your name, business, and—crucially—a backlink in publications that would otherwise ignore your pitiful cold emails.
Having weathered my fair share of marketing mishaps, I can tell you that HARO offers something precious: a relatively straightforward path to being mentioned in publications that actually matter. And unlike other link-building tactics, this one doesn't require selling your soul or pretending to be interested in "collaboration opportunities" with strangers on LinkedIn.
The Brutal Reality of HARO Success Rates
Before you get too excited, let's talk numbers. Your hit rate on HARO will likely hover around 5-10% if you're good. That means for every 20 pitches you slave over, maybe one or two will actually result in a backlink. It's a numbers game played with precious time you don't have.
Why so low? Because for every query asking about "innovative approaches to customer retention," there are 200 self-proclaimed customer retention experts falling over themselves to respond. The journalist, who's probably on their fourth coffee and staring down a deadline, has to sift through this avalanche of mediocrity to find something quotable.
And let's be honest—most HARO responses are terrible. They're either ghostwritten by junior VAs who've never actually done the thing they're writing about, painfully self-promotional, or so generic they could have been written by a marginally intelligent goldfish. This is actually good news for you. The bar is low, and clearing it isn't as hard as you might think.
How to Craft HARO Responses That Actually Get Picked
Having sent my fair share of HARO responses that disappeared into the void, I've learned what works the hard way. Here's how to craft responses that stand a fighting chance:
- Lead with credentials that actually matter. Nobody cares that you're "passionate about SEO." They care if you've built and sold an SEO agency or ranked a site in a competitive niche. Specificity beats vague expertise every time.
- Answer the actual bloody question. You'd be shocked how many people don't. Read the query carefully, then read it again. Address exactly what they're asking, not what you wish they were asking.
- Be quotable, not comprehensive. Journalists need sound bites, not dissertations. Give them 2-3 concise, slightly provocative statements they can drop directly into their article.
- Include unexpected insights. If your response could have been written by anyone with a pulse and internet access, it's not going to get picked. Share a counter-intuitive finding or a surprising data point from your own experience.
- Be timely with your response. HARO queries often have hundreds of replies within hours. Being in the first wave gives you a fighting chance of actually being read.
The key is to make the journalist's job easier. They're not looking for the world's foremost expert; they're looking for someone who can provide a clear, interesting quote that fits their narrative without requiring a PhD to understand.
The HARO Response Template That Actually Works
After much trial and error (mostly error), I've developed a template that consistently outperforms random flailing. It's not magic, but it does force you to include what journalists actually need:
Subject Line: Your subject line should include the query headline and a hint at your unique angle. For example: "Response to 'Digital Marketing Trends 2023' - Contrarian View on AI Tools"
Opening: Keep this brief. State your name, position, and 1-2 credentials directly relevant to the query. Not your life story. Not your company mission. Just why they should listen to you about this specific topic.
Direct Response: Give them exactly what they asked for in 2-3 paragraphs. Front-load your most interesting point. Use short sentences. Include specific examples or data. Make at least one point that isn't painfully obvious.
Additional Context: Offer one brief additional insight they might not have considered. This is your chance to be memorable without being annoying.
Closing: Thank them, offer availability for follow-up questions, and include your full contact details. Make it ridiculously easy for them to reach you.
This structure works because it respects the journalist's time while still giving you space to demonstrate that you're not just regurgitating common knowledge. And let's be honest—after sending dozens of these, you'll develop a sense for which queries are worth your time and which will inevitably disappear into the HARO graveyard.
Beyond the Basics: Advanced HARO Tactics
Once you've mastered the art of not being immediately deleted, it's time to level up your HARO game:
- Create journalist dossiers. When you get picked up by a journalist, research their beat and past work. Cultivating direct relationships with journalists who've quoted you once can lead to regular features without the HARO middleman.
- Develop category expertise. Instead of responding to everything, focus on becoming a go-to source in one specific niche. Your success rate will climb as you build domain expertise that's evident in your responses.
- Use timing to your advantage. Monday morning and Friday afternoon queries often receive fewer responses. The sweet spot is being among the first 10-15 responses while still being thoughtful.
- Follow up—but only once. If your quote is used but they forgot the backlink, a polite follow-up is acceptable. Don't harass them; journalists remember the annoying people.
- Track everything. Keep a spreadsheet of queries, responses, publications, and results. Over time, patterns will emerge about which types of queries convert best for your specific expertise.
The most successful HARO users aren't necessarily the most knowledgeable—they're the ones who understand what journalists need and consistently deliver it in a format that's immediately usable. Having faced my own fair share of rejection emails (or more commonly, deafening silence), I can tell you that persistence eventually pays off in this game.
When HARO Isn't Worth Your Time
Not all HARO opportunities are created equal. Some are, quite frankly, a waste of your precious time:
Queries from unknown publications or sites with domain ratings lower than your own aren't worth the effort. You're essentially donating content for a backlink that won't move the needle.
Similarly, vague queries like "Looking for business tips" will attract hundreds of generic responses. Your thoughtful insights will drown in a sea of platitudes.
And let's address the elephant in the room: some HARO queries are thinly veiled attempts to get free consulting. You can spot these by their excessive specificity and multiple sub-questions. Unless you're desperate for any mention, these rarely justify the time investment.
Having learned through painful experience what business activities actually generate ROI, I can tell you that HARO is worth it—but only if you're selective and systematic. Before responding to every query that crosses your inbox (the fast track to burnout with minimal results), it's worth evaluating whether the opportunity is actually worth solving.
Turning HARO Mentions into Actual Business Value
Getting quoted is nice for the ego, but the real value comes from leveraging those mentions:
Each backlink should be displayed prominently on your website's "As Seen In" section. There's something powerfully persuasive about third-party validation, even if you secretly know it came from a desperate journalist on deadline.
These mentions also make excellent social media content. Don't just share the link—highlight your specific quote and add context about why this perspective matters to your audience. You can also use these mentions as part of a comprehensive content funnel that guides prospects through your expertise.
The truth is, most people won't click through to read the full article where you're quoted, but they will be impressed by the publication logo displayed on your site. It's shallow, yes, but it works. After my business failure taught me the importance of perception, I've become much less precious about how authority is built. If it works, use it.
The Uncomfortable Truth About HARO
Here's the thing about HARO that nobody talks about: it's a system designed to extract free expertise from professionals to help content sites generate ad revenue. When you really think about it, it's slightly absurd. In what other context would you provide valuable insights for free, with only the possibility of a mention as compensation?
And yet, it works. The link economy of the internet has created this strange ecosystem where your knowledge has currency, but only if you're willing to give it away strategically. Having experienced the brutal reality of what happens when businesses fail to build proper distribution channels, I can tell you that this trade-off is often worth making—especially for early-stage businesses desperate for authority signals. Just like creating valuable lead magnets, HARO requires giving away your expertise to build trust and credibility.
HARO isn't glamorous. It's not revolutionary. It's a grind that occasionally pays off in ways that more sophisticated marketing tactics sometimes don't. It's the digital equivalent of showing up every day and doing the unglamorous work while everyone else is looking for shortcuts. And perhaps that's the most honest marketing lesson of all—sometimes the most effective tactics are the ones that require nothing more than persistence and a willingness to be helpful on someone else's terms.