Founder Playbook

Stop Building Features and Start Talking to Your Users: A Guide to Effective Feedback Loops

Here's a radical thought: what if the users you're building for actually know what they want? I know, I know—absolutely mental. But before you ship that shiny new feature nobody asked for, perhaps we should have a little chat about why your feedback loop is more like a feedback cul-de-sac.

Posted on
July 29, 2025
Is this good for you? statues of David

Why Your Product's Screaming for Attention: The Lost Art of Actually Listening to Users

Let me paint a familiar scene: It's 3 AM, you're bathed in the blue light of your laptop, frantically adding yet another feature to your product roadmap. You're convinced that this particular tweak will be the one that makes everything click. Meanwhile, your actual users—you know, the people who pay your bills—are somewhere out there, desperately trying to tell you what they actually want. But you can't hear them over the sound of your own keyboard. I've been there. Multiple times. Usually with a slightly concerning amount of caffeine involved.

The Delusion of Building in a Vacuum

We founders have a special talent for convincing ourselves we know exactly what the market needs. It's a peculiar form of temporary insanity that venture capitalists seem to reward. The truth is, most of us are spectacularly wrong most of the time. My personal favourite was spending three months perfecting a feature that precisely zero customers asked for. The reception? Silence so deafening you could hear a startup valuation drop.

The problem isn't that we're incompetent (well, not entirely). It's that we fall in love with solutions instead of problems. We obsess over the elegant code, the sleek design, or the clever marketing copy—all while ignoring whether anyone actually wants the bloody thing. Having weathered my own business collapse, I can tell you with absolute certainty: no amount of perfectly executed features will save a product nobody asked for. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, over 20% of small businesses fail within their first year, and nearly two-thirds don't survive a full decade, often because they overestimate revenue and fail to account for what customers truly need. Understanding these harsh realities is crucial for any founder looking to avoid the most common reasons small businesses fail.

The Radical Act of Shutting Up and Listening

Here's a revolutionary concept that shouldn't be revolutionary at all: talk to your users before, during, and after you build something. And—this is the crucial bit—actually listen to what they say. Not what you wish they'd say. Not what would conveniently fit your vision. What they actually say.

When I say "talk to users," I don't mean sending out a survey that asks, "On a scale of 1-10, how much do you love our groundbreaking innovation?" I mean proper, uncomfortable conversations where you ask open-ended questions and then endure the agonising silence that follows as they try to articulate their actual needs.

These conversations are terrifying because they might reveal that your brilliant idea isn't so brilliant after all. And that's precisely why they're invaluable. Better to know now, before you've burnt through your runway chasing phantoms, that your assumptions were off. Remember: every feature you build that doesn't solve a real problem is essentially a very expensive hobby project. As Forbes notes, billion-dollar ideas are built on problem-solving, not brainstorming—patterns in complaints, frustrations, or inefficiencies often represent growth gold.

Creating Feedback Loops That Actually Work

The term "feedback loop" gets thrown around in startup circles like business cards at a networking event—frequently and with minimal impact. A proper feedback loop isn't just having a "Contact Us" form that funnels directly into your spam folder. It's a deliberate, structured system for consistently gathering, analysing, and acting on user insights.

Here's how to create feedback loops that don't just make you feel good but actually inform your product decisions:

  • Set up regular, calendared user interviews (weekly or bi-weekly) even when you think you don't need them. Especially when you think you don't need them.
  • Create a "feedback council" of 5-10 power users who get early access to features in exchange for brutal honesty. Make sure they know their job isn't to be nice.
  • Implement actual mechanisms to track feature usage and abandonment. If nobody's using that thing you spent six weeks building, you need to know.
  • Have a standardised process for documenting and sharing user insights with your entire team—not just product folks.
  • Resist the urge to immediately explain or defend when users point out problems. Instead, ask "tell me more about that" and then suffer through the discomfort of listening.

The most valuable feedback often comes disguised as complaints. When a user bothers to tell you what's wrong, they're actually saying, "I care enough about your product to want it to be better." That's gold. Treat it accordingly. If you're struggling to identify these pain points, there are strategic places to find customer pain points beyond the obvious channels.

The Economics of Listening vs. Building

Let's talk cold, hard cash for a moment. Every feature you build has costs beyond the obvious development hours. There's the opportunity cost of not building something else. There's the increased complexity that slows down future development. There's the maintenance burden. And most importantly, there's the cognitive load you place on users who now have to figure out yet another button in your increasingly cluttered interface.

Meanwhile, talking to users is comparatively cheap. Yes, it takes time. Yes, it can be awkward. But it's nowhere near as expensive as building the wrong thing. Think of user conversations as the bargain-basement insurance policy against wasting your development resources.

I learned this lesson through the time-honoured tradition of doing exactly the opposite and watching my business slowly suffocate under the weight of features nobody wanted. It turns out users don't particularly care about your elegant solution if it doesn't solve their actual problem. Shocking, I know.

When to Ignore Your Users (Selectively)

Now, a necessary caveat: listening to users doesn't mean blindly implementing everything they request. Users are brilliant at identifying problems but often terrible at prescribing solutions. They'll ask for "a faster horse" when what they really need is a car.

Your job is to understand the underlying problem, not just the requested feature. When a user asks for something, the magic question isn't "Can we build this?" but rather "What are you trying to accomplish?" Often, there's a simpler, more elegant solution lurking beneath the feature request. This is where asking the right questions becomes crucial for determining whether a problem is genuinely worth solving.

There's also the rare occasion when you should forge ahead despite user feedback—when you're pursuing a genuinely visionary idea that users can't yet articulate. But be honest: is your feature actually visionary, or are you just uncomfortable with criticism? The difference matters enormously, and most of us aren't as visionary as we fancy ourselves.

Practical Steps to Start Tomorrow

Enough philosophy. Here are concrete steps you can take immediately to build better feedback loops:

  • Block out two hours tomorrow to call three customers with no agenda other than to understand how they're using your product. Record the calls (with permission) and listen for what they struggle with, not just what they like.
  • Add a simple in-app feedback mechanism that asks "What were you trying to accomplish just now?" instead of "Rate your experience 1-5."
  • Create a Slack channel where your entire team can share user insights, and make it the most active channel in your workspace.
  • Implement a "one in, one out" policy for features—for every new thing you add, something old has to go or be simplified.
  • Schedule a monthly "Feature Funeral" where you review and potentially kill off features that aren't providing value. Make it ceremonial. Bring cake.

The Cultural Shift: From Building to Learning

The hardest part of this entire process isn't the mechanics of setting up feedback channels. It's transforming your company culture from one that celebrates shipping to one that celebrates learning. Engineers want to build things. Designers want to design things. Product managers want to launch things. Everyone's incentives push toward more, not better.

The most successful companies I've observed have fundamentally reoriented their definition of progress. They don't measure success by features shipped but by problems solved. They celebrate the decision not to build something almost as much as the successful launch. They've made "I talked to users today" a status symbol as powerful as "I shipped code today."

This cultural shift requires leadership. If you're running the show, you need to be the most enthusiastic advocate for user conversations. Block time in your calendar for user calls. Share what you're learning. Praise team members who make decisions based on user insights. If the team sees you prioritising user feedback, they'll follow suit.

And here's where the real magic happens: when everyone in your organisation feels connected to the people using your product, they make better decisions autonomously. They instinctively ask "Would our users want this?" before diving into solutions. They develop the empathy that no product requirement document could ever capture.

Embracing the Messy Reality

The fantasy of product development is that it's a linear process: identify problem, build solution, collect praise. The reality is messier. It's iterative, circular, and often frustrating. You'll build things users ignore. You'll miss obvious pain points. You'll misinterpret feedback.

And that's perfectly fine. The goal isn't perfection; it's progress. Each conversation brings you closer to understanding. Each misstep teaches you something valuable. The only true failure is building in isolation, convinced of your own brilliance while your users quietly drift away.

I've watched my own business crumble partly because I was too busy building what I thought was brilliant to notice that it wasn't what customers actually needed. Don't be like past me. Be smarter. Talk to your users before you invest precious resources in features they'll ignore.

The most successful products aren't necessarily the ones with the most features or the cleverest technology. They're the ones that solve real problems for real people in ways that feel almost magically intuitive. And you can't build that kind of product without deeply, genuinely understanding the humans who use it.

So close your feature backlog for a moment. Pick up the phone. Send some emails. Schedule some calls. Your users have been waiting to tell you exactly what they need. All you have to do is ask—and then do the much harder thing: listen.

Other Blogs

Sip the good stuff. Ideas worth stealing.

Sign-up
Be the first to hear when we launch

Guess Less. Build Better.